Since getting map and records from the Museum I see I am mistaken in calling the long-limbed Diplodocus-like animal No. 165. It is 150. If these bones which I have mentioned belong together we have a long limbed long necked, slender fellow apparently quite a little different from Diplodocus Carnegiei. Of course we are speculating yet. The radius and ulna we have found are longer and heavier I should say than in Diplodocus (about 3 1/2 ft long). The heavier, longer forelimb may match a long neck.